|
|
I am on the net through an interface different from the one use when
you do. I am submitting the coding of my written text and I am going to
submit it back into the net again and again until the resonant syntaxes
of networked mind reinforces itself so that any semblance of my text,
with perhaps the exception of of of subject, is destroyed. What you
will hear, then, are the natural resonant syntaxes of networked mind
articulated by text. I regard this activity not not not not so much as
a demonstration of a linguistic fact, but more as a way to to to smooth
out any irregularities my text might have. (Original English Text)
I am in the network through an interface different from which you use
when you do it. I am putting under the codification of my written text
repeated times until the resonant syntaxes of the mind networked are
reinforced, to destroy any appearance of my text, with perhaps the
exception of the subject. What you then will hear are the natural
resonant syntaxes of the mind networked articulated by the text. I
watch this activity not as much as demonstration of a linguistic fact
but more as way to a to smooth outside any irregularity my text could
have.(Spanish)
I am in the net through a different relation of that you use when you.
I am submitting coding of my written text repeated times until the
syntaxes resonant of the mind networked if strengthen, in way that all
semblance of my text, with perhaps the exception of the subject, is
destroyed. What you it will hear then networked is the natural syntaxes
resonant of the mind articulated by the text. I consider this activity
not thus very as a demonstration of a linguistic fact but more as a way
to smoothing for my text is of all the irregularities could
have.(Portuguese)
I am on the net by an interface different from that which you employ
when you. I subject the coding of my text written on several occasions
until resounding syntaxes of the spirit managed in network is
reinforced, so that any appearance of my text, with perhaps the
exception of of the subject, is destroyed. What you will hear then is
the resounding syntaxes normal of the spirit managed in network
articulated by the text. I consider this activity not so much as a
demonstration of a linguistic fact but more as manner with with of
smoothing out of all the irregularities my text could have.(French)
I am on the net by an interface, which is different to that, which you
use, when they submits I coding my written text again and again, until
the Resonanzsyntaxen of the interlaced understanding strengthens, thus
each possible appearance of my text, with possibly the exception of the
topic, is destroyed. Which you hear then, the natural Resonanzsyntaxen
of the interlaced understanding is articulated by text. I regard this
activity not not not not as much as a demonstration of a linguistic
fact, but more than way too too, from all possible irregularities to
make smooth could my text have.(German)
I have been used exactly on by an interface differing from you when u.
I present the codage of my written text and to resonating syntaxes of
genetwerkte opinion reinforce myself again again, so that any
appearance of my text is destroyed, with perhaps the exception of of of
subject. What you then will hear be natural resonating syntaxes of
genetwerkte opinion which is articulated by text. I do not consider to
this activity not not not so that much if demonstration of a linguistic
fact but more if manner is able to to to smooth my text any
irregularities.(Dutch)
I am in the net via a contact different from the one that you use when.
I repeatedly submit the coding of my written text until o'toy are
strengthened sonorous you drew up the found connections brain, so any
resemblance of my text, with perhaps the exception of subject, is
destroyed. What you will hear then they are naturally sonorous you drew
up the found connections brain that is articulated by the text. I
consider this activity no no no no so much as demonstration of
linguistic make but more as way in order to smooths outside any
irregularities my text to have.(Greek)
I am located on the network through the abutting surface being differed
from one, you is which you use when you you make. I represent
kodirvoaniye of my text in the writing form again and again as long as
the resounding syntaxes networked of reason not to strengthen so that
will be destroyed any semblance of my text, with possibly the exception
of a question. You will hear after this the natural resounding syntaxes
networked of reason artikulirovannye by text. I count this work so much
as the demonstration of linguistic fact but more as road k to to
smoothen of all irregularities my text it could have.(Russian)
I am am different you in the net through the connection with that to
use you. I submit my written text establishment formula to resonate the
syntax once more until the network brains to strengthen oneself, in
order to my text any semblance, has perhaps the subject exception, is
destroyed. Any you then will hear will be the network brains naturally
resonate the syntax explicitly to express by the text. I not extremely
thought this moves a language fact the demonstration but to take a way
to enable smoothly my text perhaps to have outside all
irregularity.(Cantonese)
I passing by another interface from those which you use once upon a
time am in the net. I, in order to be destroyed, until resonance syntax
of ÉlÉb ÉgÉèÅ[ÉN heart reinforces them themselves, the embankment have
put out coding the text by my document many times with any form of my
text which perhaps excludes the exception of subject. Then what which
is heard it is connected by the text and there is a natural resonance
syntax of ÇÈ network heart. As for me my text to roughly loosely from
irregularity becomes smooth to as a demonstration of language fact and
the method of regarding this activity so more, perhaps it has,
(Japanese)
Me you when peel and with the fact that you use different crew-serve
territory you lead and it is a net. Probably in exception of subject
questionable matter what kind of appearance of my, original, in order
the description below which is destroyed the net we khu the syntax
which mind rings will strengthen and until, me the nose of the original
which me, it writes ting some time and it is obeying. You that time the
net which by the original talks what a thing which it will listen to
clearly we khu the natural enemy of mind are the syntax which rings. Me
but lapse it regards this activity in demonstration of language fact
little more with in method my, original does smoothly from what kind of
irregularity and.(Korean) |
|
|
|
|
When
algorithms are employed as formal compositional devices they provide
mechanisms for revealing an inner nature: of sound, of material, of
process, of our perceptions, of our systems of symbols and metaphors.
By placing an emphasis on active listening rather than the sending and
receiving of messages, an artist can be freed from the bounds of mere
self-expression and the work can become revelatory.
David Worrall
|
|
|
|
|
I am sitting in a room different
from the one you are in now. I am recording the sound of my speaking
voice and I am going to play it back into the room again and again
until the resonant frequencies of the room reinforce themselves so that
any semblance of my speech, with perhaps the exception of r-r-r-rhythm,
is destroyed. What you will hear, then, are the natural resonant
frequencies of the room articulated by speech. I regard this activity
n-n-n-n-not so much as a demonstration of a physical fact, but more as
a way to s-s-smooth out any irregularities my speech might have. |
|
|